eclectic_boy: (Default)
[personal profile] eclectic_boy
Noda and I just had a great conversation, triggered by [livejournal.com profile] uncleamos's latest news, ranging through Canadian politics, religious origins of conscience, the estate tax, and more. It was a revelation to me that Canadian politics is overtly organized so that anyone who doesn't vote their party's line is punished by their party with things like withdrawal of support in the next election. It's not unheard of in the US to do things like decrease the power of a legislator for bucking the party at a crucial time, but to have it this ingrained, this much a standard practice. In Canada. This may be the first time I've so thought that a Canadian political practice was far inferior to the American way -- here not only can a Specter follow his own beliefs on a regular basis; he can even be made chair of an important committee. This is definitely one thing I hope we don't learn from our northern neighbor....

Date: 2006-09-27 08:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aryky.livejournal.com
Anyone who knows more about this can correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that sort of policy fairly standard in parliamentary systems?

I remember having a conversation with my father about this issue in a British context, and my father defending the British party system, but I don't quite remember what his defense was. I kind of wish I did, especially since I normally find what my father says about politics to be worth consideration.

February 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
2324 25262728 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 07:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios